Connect with us

World News

US Supreme Court agrees to hear cases on statute of limitations and personal jurisdiction – JURIST

Published

on

On Monday, the US Supreme Court granted certiorari to two cases, Reed v. Goertz and Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, which focus on issues of statute of limitations and personal jurisdiction. of limitations begins to file for an action under 42 USC § 1983 seeking evidence of DNA evidence at the crime scene on the grounds that available state procedures are constitutionally inadequate.” Currently, circuit courts of appeals across the country use different standards to measure the statute of limitations. In 1998, a jury convicted Petitioner Reed of murdering Stacey Stites. At the time of her death, Stites was in a relationship with Jimmy Fennell, a police officer. Reed maintained that he and Stites had a consensual sexual relationship and that Fennell murdered her for having an affair with a black man. Prosecutors argued that Reed kidnapped Stites from the house he shared with Fennell and murdered her. Reed has maintained his innocence for more than two decades and has repeatedly requested DNA testing of “key crime scene evidence.” the state trial court denied Reed’s 2014 discovery request. However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals remanded the case for additional findings and issued an opinion in 2017, after the statute of limitations had expired. it had expired. In Mallory, the court will decide whether a state violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment if it requires a corporation to consent to personal jurisdiction to conduct business in the state. Petitioner Mallory sued Norfolk in Pennsylvania after the corporation exposed him to carcinogens and he developed cancer. .” The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that such a legal scheme constitutes a “compulsory submission to general jurisdiction by legislative mandate” and violates the Constitution. Mallory appealed to the Supreme Court for review of him.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

World News

Trump Affiliated Businessman Sentenced to 20 Months in Prison for Political Donation Crimes – JURIST

Published

on

The Justice Department said Wednesday that Lev Parnas, a businessman involved in the Trump-Ukraine affair, was sentenced to 20 months in prison on multiple counts related to soliciting donations from a foreign national. Parnas was convicted on charges of “conspiring to make political contributions of a foreign national in conjunction with soliciting and aiding and abetting the making thereof, conspiracy to make fictitious donations, participation in a wire fraud conspiracy, and making false statements and falsifying records. Parnas will also pay more than $2 million in restitution. The charges of making political contributions by a foreign national stem from events that occurred in March 2018. Parnas and other associates wanted to launch a business to obtain retail marijuana licenses in the US. The group turned over hundreds of thousands of dollars in political contributions before the 2018 election to curry favor with anyone who could help Parnas and his associates obtain these licenses. Parnas and an associate made a donation of $325,000 and falsely claimed that the donation was from Global Power Producers (GEP). Parnas also lied about the fact that he was receiving bogus donations and the contributions were not his own money. The fraud guarantee charges are from between 2012 and 2019. Parnas planned to defraud several people by convincing them to invest in his company. He said the contributions would be used solely for his business. Instead, the payments were withdrawn in cash, placed in personal bank accounts, and used for personal expenses. Damian Williams, US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, stated: “Parnas also defrauded the American public by pumping Russian money into US elections and lying about the origin of funds for political contributions. My office will continue to aggressively prosecute those who put their personal and financial benefit above their country and their investors.” The office’s Public Corruption Unit is handling the Parnas case.

Continue Reading

World News

Indonesian parliament passes law to create more provinces in Papua amid fears of government crackdown – JURIST

Published

on

The Indonesian People’s Representative Council on Thursday approved legislation to establish three new provinces in the Papua region. The decision was made during the 26th plenary session when all members unanimously agreed to pass three bills that established the new provinces. Currently, the easternmost region of Indonesia is divided into two regions, Papua and West Papua. However, it will now be divided into five provinces. The three new provinces have been named, South Papua Province with Merauke as its capital, Central Papua Province with Nabire as its capital, and Papua Mountains Province with Jaya wijaya as its capital. Ahmad Doli Kurnia Tandjung, Chairperson of the Council Commission, stated that: The purpose of partitioning Papua is to speed up equitable development, speed up the improvement of public services, speed up community welfare and uplift the dignity of the indigenous people of Papua. Papua. Taking into account political, administrative and legal aspects, socio-cultural unity, human resource preparation, basic infrastructure, economic capacity, future developments and aspirations of the Papuan people. Veronica Koman of Amnesty International Australia expressed concern about how the legislation would affect Papuans. She said that by “cutting and dividing Papua into smaller administrative units, [the Indonesian government] hopes to divide and conquer Papuan identity and resistance.”

Continue Reading

World News

German court sentences 101-year-old former Nazi concentration camp guard to 5 years in prison – JURIST

Published

on

Germany’s Neuruppin Regional Court in Brandenburg on Tuesday convicted a 101-year-old former Nazi concentration camp guard of 3,518 counts of accessory to murder and sentenced him to five years in prison. Former SS guard Josef Schuetz was indicted for his involvement in the “execution by firing squad of Soviet prisoners of war in 1942” and for operating the gas chambers at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp. Josef denied all the alleged charges and claimed that he worked as a farm laborer near Pasewalk in northeast Germany. However, the court began the trial last year in October. Judge Udo Lechtermann noted that the defendant “voluntarily supported mass extermination” in his role. He further said: The court is satisfied that you worked as a guard in the concentration camp for about three years, despite your claims to the contrary. You saw how deported people were cruelly tortured and killed there every day for three years. Sachsenhausen saw 200,000 people imprisoned, with at least 30,000 deaths. Joseph is considered the oldest person to be convicted of Holocaust crimes. Previously, a 93-year-old former guard was convicted of 5,232 murders and a 95-year-old former field secretary was charged with 10,000 counts of accessory to murder, rulings pending. Joseph can appeal his sentence to the Federal Court of Justice within a week.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022