Connect with us

World News

Airbnb shooting in Pittsburgh results in 2 deaths and numerous injuries – JURIST

Published

on

A shooting at an Airbnb party on Pittsburgh’s North Side early Sunday morning resulted in 10 gunshot victims. Local hospitals pronounced two minor victims dead as a result of the shooting. The first shots were fired around 2:30 a.m. during a large party attended by up to 200 people, including many under the age of 18. Pittsburgh police to the scene. When police arrived, additional shots were fired and several youths were seen fleeing the scene on foot and in a vehicle. In addition to the shooting victims, police reported injuries from people who jumped out of Airbnb windows to seek shelter. Police also noted that up to 50 rounds were fired inside the Airbnb. This is the worst mass shooting in Pittsburgh since the Tree of Life synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh’s Squirrel Hill neighborhood in 2018. That shooting claimed the lives of 11 people. One of Pittsburgh Mayor Ed Gainey’s top priorities during his 2021 campaign was public safety. In response to this incident, Gainey stated: At least 10 shooting victims, two lives lost, and hundreds of lives changed forever, because we have yet to pass meaningful legislation to decrease the number of guns on our streets or provide the resources we so much are needed. to desperately needy communities. The time has come for us to move with a sense of urgency to bring justice to the victims and peace to our city. We have been working on our approach to addressing gun violence in our city for the past few weeks. We will now convene a meeting with key community and public safety leaders to present our All In Citywide public safety approach to get their feedback so we can build a path together. This incident is the fourth in a series of shootings throughout the city. weekend. Around 2:00 am Saturday, a shooting on McClure Avenue on the North Side claimed the life of one person. Later that day, around 2:30 pm, three people were shot and injured in the East Hills. At 10:30 PM, an individual was shot on Center Avenue in the Hill District. That individual went to the hospital in critical condition. Investigations are ongoing for all of these incidents. The city saw an increase in gun violence from 2020 to 2021. This trend appears to continue in 2022. Pittsburgh Police Chief Scott Schubert stated that he was “deeply concerned about the recent wave of violent crime.” in the city” and called this increase in violent crime “unacceptable.” In response to the shootings of Dayvon Vickers and Devonte White last month, Gainey declared that there was a “pandemic of gun violence” and that it was time to end it.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

World News

US Supreme Court Rejects Prison Clerk’s Qualified Immunity Case – JURIST

Published

on

On Thursday, the US Supreme Court declined to consider whether jail officials who “unreasonably respond” to “obvious risk” are protected by qualified immunity. Derek Monroe was placed on suicide watch while in a Texas jail by jail administrator Mary Jo Brixey. Monroe attempted suicide. Sheriff Leslie Cogdill reportedly spoke with Monroe and reflected concerns about Monroe’s mental health on his intake form. However, Cogdill and Jesse Laws, the jailer on duty, placed Monroe alone in a cell with a 30-inch rope. According to court documents, “prison policy, prison training, and common sense directed officers not to isolate an inmate known to be suicidal in a cell with an obvious potential ligation.” monroe The petition states that “[c]Requesting emergency assistance was a precaution Laws knew he should have taken. A trial court held that defendants Law, Cogdill and Brixey were not entitled to qualified immunity. However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. Justice Sotomayor dissented from the court’s denial, calling Laws’ inaction an “inexplicable and unreasonable decision” that showed a “deliberate disregard for Monroe’s life or death.” -medical necessities of death.”

Continue Reading

World News

Uzbekistan: Protests in autonomous republic over proposed constitutional reform – JURIST

Published

on

Protests erupted in Nukus, the capital of Uzbekistan’s autonomous republic of Karakalpakstan, on Friday over a proposed constitutional reform. According to a statement from the government of the region: Despite the policy of openness and free expression of will followed by the Republic of Uzbekistan, on July 1, 2022 in Nukus, a criminal group of people organized illegal actions expressed in an attempt to take over the state. administrative bodies of the Republic of Karakalpakstan. The demonstrators were protesting the planned removal of the section of the current constitution that allows Karakalpakstan the right to secede from Uzbekistan by referendum. This has caused outrage among the ethnic Karakalpak, who make up the majority of the population of Karakalpakstan. Karakalpaks from neighboring Kazakhstan held a round table discussion on the proposed change. One speaker, Rustem Matekov, stated that the day of the referendum on the new version of the constitution will be “the day of the funeral of the people of the Republic of Karakalpakstan”. However, the president of Uzbekistan, Shavkat Mirziyoyev, has challenged this view, saying: We, two peoples, have become one, we are blood relatives. Previously, the regions did not know the streets of Karakalpakstan or Nukus, but now we work as one people, the youth of Karakalpakstan achieve great results. […] I respect the Karakalpak people with all my heart and I can proudly say that I am a son not only of the Uzbeks, but also of the Karakalpak people. Removal is not the only proposal on the table. Other proposals include strengthening civil rights and extending the presidential term from five to seven years, which would allow Mirziyoyev to run again despite having served two consecutive terms.

Continue Reading

World News

US Supreme Court overturns lower court injunctions on state abortion laws – JURIST

Published

on

On Thursday, the US Supreme Court struck down three orders issued by lower courts in Arizona, Indiana and Arkansas that had invalidated abortion at the state level based on Roe v. Wade. This follows the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe last Friday. The now-overturned Arizona ruling had stopped a state law criminalizing abortions performed on fetuses with non-lethal genetic abnormalities, of which Down syndrome is one. The injunction targeted relevant portions of four clauses of Senate Bill 1457, which makes it a felony for a physician to perform an abortion “knowing that the abortion is sought solely because of a genetic abnormality of the child.” The law also requires the doctor to sign an affidavit stating that the abortion is not performed for this reason and to inform the patient of the illegality of abortions due to genetic abnormalities. Finally, it requires doctors to inform the State when a genetic abnormality has been detected. This law was challenged in Brnovich v. Isaacson in 2021, and the injunction was upheld by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Arkansas’s 2019 ruling in Little Rock Planning Services v. Rutledge passed three laws that prohibited abortion in various circumstances. Arkansas Code, Title 20, Chapter 26, Law 493 prohibits abortions after 18 weeks of gestation, with exceptions for medical emergencies and pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. Law 619 prohibits all abortions solely on the basis of having a reason to believe that the fetus has Down syndrome, with the same exceptions. Law 700 requires that the person performing an abortion be a doctor licensed in obstetrics and gynecology. The federal court order of these laws was upheld by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. In Indiana, a 2017 ruling in the case of Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky had mandated a law that prohibited abortions before 20 weeks in several cases. . The law, Indiana Code Chapter 16-34-4, prohibits abortions before 20 weeks if the abortion was for demographic, sexual, or fetal disability reasons. Specifically, abortion is prohibited if sought because of the possibility of a genetically inherited disease, defect, or disorder, whether or not it has been screened for or any risk is present. This includes, but is not limited to, Down syndrome and any mental, physical and intellectual disabilities. Abortions related to the sex of the fetus, or its race, color, national origin, or ancestry, are also prohibited. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld the injunction. The three laws imposed by the precautionary measures will take effect immediately. These cases will be sent back to the lower court for further proceedings.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022